4 March 2005

ripped from the Hong Kong headlines...

Every day here at the Kowloon Hotel I find a newspaper in a bag on my doorknob, and on my way out I usually chuck the paper onto a growing pile atop my desk. Today, however, I opted to bring it with me, leaving the empty bag to look forlorn and devoid of purpose on my doorknob. I must assume that the proper authorities will give it the care and attention that it needs, just as my room is always mystically tidied up when I return with my pajamas folded and my free water bottles replenished. It's magic, I think.

So anyway I grabbed today's Standard and flipped through it during the morning cab ride (5.42 kilometers this time over 10.55 minutes and found some interesting things.

On the second page I discovered that the (Frank Gehry-designed) Los Angeles Walt Disney Concert Hall (which is enough proper nouns to create several smaller buildings) is apparently reflecting heat at some nearby condominiums. I am assuming that Frank never considered what his parabolic sheets of steel would do to the people and buildings at their focal points. Read more about the building here. According to the little bit in the paper, a "A US$90,000 (HK$702,000) makeover of the structure's stainless steel panels is being carried out in an effort to reduce the heat reflected at condominiums whose air-conditioning system is being overwhelmed." So it's not particularly local but it's an interesting to know for no reason at all.

In that category also can be filed an update about the Michael Jackson trial. I'm staying in the dark as to what is going on, so to read about people being trapped in the Neverland fortress make no sense to me, nor stories of Jackson staffers physically threatening the guests, nor rumors of smear campaigns and maligned hypnotists (well, he's only attached to the trial because he shares a publicist with Mike). About those I really do not care, nor will I seek more information. I did find one thing interesting: this former publicist has testified that she had a theory that Sony is actively seeking to let him destroy himself so that they will somehow get their music rights back--to the Beatles and his own and so on. It's an intriguing idea and no doubt merely the first of the new conspiracy theories surrounding famous black men and their trials. Or not.

I discovered that one of the companies with which we work to make our jeans (and other clothes) is also the owner of the Circle K chain of convenience stores. To discover that is to realize that I really don't know much at all about the companies with which we have dealings.

Then again I don't know much in general, particularly about the international community. According to a recent survey (sampled dubiously, mind you) over half of the Chinese people surveyed thought that the "the US is trying to contain the mainland's development" but even more than that "admired or accepted American culture". Just over ten percent considered the US government to be "friendly", citing concerns about US's attitude about Taiwan (and the weapons we apparently sell them) but also noting the war in Iraq being waged under false pretenses. Furthermore four of every five thought that the US and China could come to blows in the future solely because of the whole Taiwan issue. I honestly know very little about Taiwan, and would probably give pretty skewed and scattershot answers to a similar questionnaire given to me about us and China and Taiwan. And in other nearly meaningless metrics, some estimates peg the number of smokers in China at 350 million, which other estimates would indicate to be some thirty six percent of the population. This is also apparently one third the number of smokers in the entire world, according to other estimates. That is a lot of smokers, in any estimation.

China is almost an entirely different world altogether. Up front I must admit that I only got two hours into the Canton province on Tuesday, but I suspect what I saw is representative of much of the country, and I will be generalizing about all of the large country based on a very, very small chunk of one corner of it. China is under construction. All of it. Everywhere we went there were buildings being torn down and thrown up and lots being leveled and streets being paved and overpasses being built. It is a state of utter chaos.

There's a story on page A11 about the government attempting to clamp down on rampant illegal power plant construction. I don't know much about the law, but I think there should be far more involved in building a power plant as compared to, say, having a stall at night selling knockoff Prada and Rolex merchandise, but apparently several plants are underway at this very moment, recklessly so. Moreover they are "often irrespective of environmental procedures and without proper planning procedures." which is good to know, I suppose. Note that down, clandestine megawatters, that you should plan properly and be nice to the environment--not that the government seems to be doing anything of the sort.

And not that this is related to anything, but I need to remember that the "New Mail Notification" wav file that I prefer is ir_end.wav for that special 'woosh' that seems somehow nicer than the generic dings and bings and whatnot.

8 December 2004

tuesday morning science lesson

Today's entry is brought to you by the Page-A-Day "Fact or Crap" desk calendar (last seen here): "The main difference between frogs and toads is that frogs are slimy and toads are dry." Wow. This is true, and so fitting for this year's Leap Day (I've been sitting on some of these for a while, you see).

It's a fact! To elaborate:

In addition, frogs tend to spend more time in the water than their warty amphibious cousins do, and they lay eggs in a mass, while toads lay theirs in a chain.

I don't really have much else to say about frogs and toads. Hopefully we will all be able now to identify them at a glance (or a touch, I suppose, to determine sliminess/dryness) and as such we will all be that little bit better off.

1 December 2004

avoid saprizo.com

It's strange searching Google and finding no results at all for something. Moreover it is strange to 'whois' a domain and find that it is available, despite the fact that it resolves to an existing address. I'm getting ahead of myself, though.

Today I found an interesting message in my inbox, with the unassuming subject line "You've won a Microsoft X-Box, (This is not spam)." I was immediately suspicious (but also curious, since it had made it through my filters) so I opened it cautiously. The sender was unfamiliar, and I doubted that I could win a contest I never entered. Click below to see the text of the email and the rest of what I found.

Return-path: <administrator@saprizo.com>
Envelope-to: --me--Delivery-date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 23:53:09 -0800
To: --me--From: "Saprizo" <administrator@saprizo.com>
Message-ID: <2004-lzckqqge.lzckqqge-lzckqqge.ilwsvlpz.mail@saprizo.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 07:52:50 +0000 (GMT)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 129.105.16.56
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: administrator@saprizo.com
Subject: You've won a Microsoft X-Box, (This is not spam).
Content-Type: text/html
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.0 (2004-09-13)rawhide.frogspace.net
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_60,DCC_CHECK,HTML_20_30,
HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HEADER_CTYPE_ONLY,MIME_HTML_ONLY,
RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,YOU_WON autolearn=disabled version=3.0.0
X-Spam-Level: ****
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.1+cvs (built Mon, 18 Oct 2004 15:55:05 -0700)

Greetings,

Your email address was entered into our Microsoft X-Box promotional competition at
http://www.Saprizo.com

This is a prize draw, you have actually won a brand new Microsoft X-Box Gaming Console!

Your package also includes these top 5 games:
- Halo: Combat Evolved
- Grand Theft Auto Double Pack
- Madden NFL 2004
- Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time
- Tom Clancy's Rainbox Six 3

You are now invited to login to our website and claim your prize that you have won.
There are only 3 winners in total this month, out of thousands of emails, so do count yourself lucky!

We have provided the following web link for you, it is temporary and expires in 72 hours.
If you do not login within this time, your X-Box shall unfortunately be returned to the prize pool.

Here is your link!--link removed--On this page you will need to enter this pass code number to proceed:

204197

This is very important. Do not lose that number!
Put in your address, and we will send your X-Box to you.

We hope that you will enjoy your new X-Box gaming console.

Best Regards,

From Microsoft and the Saprizo.com team!

So I tried the link, after removing as much personal information from it as possible. I ended up at saprizo.com, which whois tells me is unregistered.

Hmm, that's odd.

Please note that following these links is quite possibly very stupid. I do not encourage you to do this, though I am providing them anyway.

I ended up here, once I stripped away the frames and changed my email address: http://www.saprizo.com/cgi-bin/server.cgi?registrant=garbage@in.garbage.out&code=a&xm=1

I typed in my special code to get to this: http://www.saprizo.com/cgi-bin/server.cgi?entrycode=204197®istrant=garbage%40in.garbage.out&xm=0&enter=enter

Which still looks legitimate, I suppose. There's an address form, and then these paragraphs:

Due to several people attempting to hack our website to claim free prizes, we now require that you pay for shipping costs as verification that you are an actual winner. We apologize for this inconvenience but it is to make sure that YOU get your X-Box, not someone else!

You will only be charged for the shipping option that you select below. The X-Box itself is of no charge.

People hacking their website? Nearest I can tell it just now sprung into being. I read on and immediately was sure that this is a scam:

Shipping:
Shipping option:
12-01-04:

At this time only debit card transactions are able to be processed, due to technical reasons. We hope to have credit card processing online as soon as possible. Thank you kindly for your patience.

Card Type:
Card Number:
Expiry Date:
PIN

Don't worry, I stole only their form, not the stuff behind it. They want debit cards and PINs? Oh yeah, like I would hand that information out on an insecure site that seems to be somewhere in, oh, I don't know, Korea somewhere (66.41.135.100). Sign me right up.

So I surfed back around the site, and ended up sending them an email asking if there was any possible way to pay without a debit card. I'll update this if Kento Kawaguchi or one of his colleagues ever reply, but I'm not holding my breath.

I just didn't find anything about the site when I searched Google nor does the domain reveal anything. Please feel free to add comments below or link to better information.

19 November 2004

sleep, perchance to dream

Today's bit of trivia is also courtesy of the Page-a-day Fact or Crap desk calendar. It seemed appropriate for today (though it is in fact from August 7th), since I was able to sleep in until after noon, and I while I snoozed this morning I had some odd dreams myself: "Reptiles do not dream." Once again, this is a fact (not crap) and they continue:

Although all reptiles, birds, and mammals sleep, they do not all dream. It is believed that some birds dream for just seconds at a time, while some mammals, such as chimpanzees, can dream for several minutes, the way humans do. Reptiles may have rapid eye movements during sleep, but scientific studies prove that these movements are not accompanied by brain waves that allow them to dream.

What a life that must be, to not dream.

I tried watching City of lost children (by Jean-Pierre Jeunet and Marc Caro) recently but wasn't able to give it the concentration and attention it deserved (or rather demanded). I'll try it again once I've lifted my half-hearted library embargo once this month ends or I finish my novel. I've got quite a stack of movies and books and music even to enjoy once I turn off my vacation hold.

18 November 2004

what a fruity idea

Today's tidbit of knowledge comes from my desktop "Fact or Crap" calendar (which is based on the game of the same name, what a shame). This is an actual fact, according to them, and not crap: "Gorillas do not drink water." They go on to explain thusly:

Gorillas' diet is based on fruits and stems, and these succulent foods provide neough water to sustain them. Gorillas also eat some invertebrates, such as ants and insects, but they have never been observed hunting or feeding on any other animals.

What a neat idea, getting water from fruits and other parts of plants. If this is true, why do so many people eat salads with a bottle of water next to them, I wonder. I suppose I should hoard some apples at my desk since as of late I haven't been getting nearly enough water to drink during the day.

As for the gorillas, reread it up there where it says that they "have never been observed" eating animals. This sounds like a hedge to me. I'd much prefer that the calendar stated "Gorillas don't eat meat" but since they didn't I'll now be watching over my shoulder for the unseen omnivorous ape about to make me his meal. I suppose if I hide out in drinking water I'll be okay.

30 September 2004

potpourri and the like

There's something I need to know. In light of some of the movies I've seen lately (The Net, Enemy of the state, Paycheck and The Code conspiracy just to name a few), I have a question. Why can't they make a so-called high-tech thriller film without gratuitous chases? Heck, Sandra Bullock spends easily three times as much time on the run than on a computer in The Net.

Why?

On an unrelated note, today I gave blood again. I wasn't shooting for a record this time (unlike the last time) as the nurse had mentioned something about low times being a bad thing (she said something about arterial splits or some such) so I took it easy.

By my reckoning it took five and a half mintes this time.

And for future reference, my blood type is A- (A minus, that is). I remember almost every phone number I've ever had, but I can't ever seem to remember my blood type (a grade I earned occasionally in school, if I recall).